Hormonal Therapy and Osteoporosis – New Options.

Near Bryce Canyon Utah; bj gabrielsen

Osteoporosis (bone loss) is one of several side effects which accompany androgen deprivation (hormonal) therapy (ADT). Fifty (50) percent of men will be affected by their fourth year of treatment, and more than 80 percent will be affected after10 years. The risk of fractures including those of the spine also increases with hormonal therapy treatment for a year or more. This enhanced risk is illustrated by a recent study in The New England Journal of Medicine where it was reported that “among men with prostate cancer who lived for at least five years after their diagnosis, the risk of a fracture was nearly 20 percent among androgen deprivation (hormonal) therapy users, compared with 13 percent for nonusers.” Men treated with hormonal therapy are generally advised to have annual bone density testing.

Medications are also often prescribed to halt bone loss. The well-known bisphosphonates (such as Fosamax) are the first treatments prescribed followed by selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifem, used in the treatment of breast cancer. For prostate cancer patients, a new alternative, a monoclonal antibody called denosumab (brand names Xgeva or Prolia), is now generating much attention. Denosumab is an injectable monoclonal antibody. Monoclonal antibodies are made to target and destroy only certain cells in the body thereby helping to protect healthy cells from damage. Xgeva is used to prevent bone fractures and other skeletal conditions in people with tumors that have spread to the bone.  Prolia is another brand of denosumab used to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who have high risk of bone fracture. In November 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Prolia (Xgeva) to help prevent skeletal-related events in prostate cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy whose cancer had already metastasized to bone. The use of this therapy has recently been expanded. On Friday, September 16, 2011, the FDA approved denosumab (Prolia) in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation (hormonal) therapy whose cancer had not yet metastasized to bone. Denosumab is also approved by the FDA for additional indications. The brand Prolia was approved by the FDA on June 1, 2010 for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who are considered to be at high-risk for fractures.

For more details, see the Johns Hopkins Health Alerts, “Prostate Cancer: Why You May be at High Risk for Osteoporosis,” Sept. 29th, 2011; and, “FDA Expands Approval for Denosumab”, NewsPulse from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, Sept. 30th, 2011;

Information from Johns Hopkins: a) Use of Immunotherapies (Provenge, Prostvac) Against Prostate Cancer; and, b) Gleason Scores.

Broad Run-Middletown, MD; bj gabrielsen photo

Provenge (sipuleucel-T) was the first approved prostate cancer therapy which uses a person’s immune system to fight the disease.  Its approval was limited to men with advanced prostate cancer who have not responded to other treatments like hormonal (androgen deprivation) therapy and are experiencing few or no symptoms. Cost and supply remain significant issues hindering its widespread use. A recent article in the Johns Hopkins Health Alerts (September 8th, 2011) describes on-going studies involving the administration of Provenge under differing conditions. These include: a) combining Provenge with hormonal therapy in patients with earlier stage disease; b) combining Provenge with radiation therapy in hopes that the combination will have a greater effect than either of the two therapies alone (synergism); and, c) Phase 3 studies in men with early-stage, non-metastatic prostate cancer. Other immunotherapies in clinical trials include Prostvac (from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health) which may be less costly.

In another earlier issue of the Johns Hopkins Health Alerts (August 24th, 2011), the concept of the Gleason score is described. It is defined as a grade assigned to biopsied tumor cells to indicate a tumor’s potential aggressiveness. This tumor grade “reflects how far the cancer cells deviate from normal, healthy cells.” Gleason scores of 5 and 6 are generally classified as low-grade tumors, a Gleason score of 7 as intermediate and Gleason scores of 8, 9 and 10 as high grade, with the least favorable outlook.

 These Johns Hopkins Health Alerts and additional Bulletins written by Dr. Jacek Mostwin and colleagues are invaluable sources of current information for prostate cancer patients.

GOOD NEWS!!! New Regimens and Therapeutic Agents in the Pipeline; a Visit with my Oncologist.

Every six months, I have an appointment with my oncologist at the Moffitt Cancer Center, on the campus of the University of South Florida, in Tampa. Moffitt is a designated National Cancer Institute (NCI, National Institutes of Health, my former employer) Comprehensive Cancer Center, a highly-sought-after distinction. My oncologist had been highly recommended to me by former program directors at the National Cancer Institute. I am always grateful for the opportunity to discuss with him not only my own situation but to learn about new potential therapies in various stages of clinical trials.

One such earlier appointment is chronicled in the My Story section of this website, November 25th, 2009. At that time, we had discussed the positive results seen in prostate cancer patients treated with either Provenge or abiraterone. In 2011, both of these drugs have now received FDA approval. This has affected my own prognosis dramatically. When a prostate cancer patient becomes resistant (refractory) to standard hormonal therapy and the cancer metastasizes, the next chemotherapy option is usually taxotere and prednisone. Serious side effects often accompany taxotere / prednisone treatment. I am currently in my 5th year on hormonal therapy and my oncologist informed me that I could be maintained in this non-symptomatic manner for years before I would become refractory. Looking ahead, I did not look forward to chemotherapy with taxotere. But with the availability of new therapies, my own “treatment schedule” had changed. After hormonal therapy, I would probably be placed sequentially on Provenge and/or abiraterone, both of which are effective and well tolerated. All in all, the goal of prostate cancer patients like myself is simply to “buy quality time” unless God chooses to heal us directly (which is always possible). I am now nearly 70 years of age. I just may out-live this disease. God uses many methods and the God-given talents of many people to heal or stabilize our diseases.

To make the situation more optimistic, the following are several new potential therapies in various stages of clinical trials. [For an excellent overview of the various phases (I, II, III) of clinical testing required of a drug to obtain FDA approval, see the Johns Hopkins Health Alert related to prescription drugs,  posted March 10, 2009. Phase I studies focus mainly on biological effects, including harmful side effects of the drug on the human body; Phase II studies attempt to demonstrate whether the drug provides a safe benefit in treating people with a specific condition; and, Phase III studies better define the benefits, risks and side effects of the drug.]

1) As a follow-up to current hormonal (androgen deprivation) therapy, Millennium and its parent company Takeda Pharmaceutical, are developing TAK-700 (future name to be Ortoronel), a selective, oral, non-steroidal androgen synthesis inhibitor. In preclinical studies TAK-700 has been shown to bind to and inhibit the enzyme 17,20-lyase 1 in the testes and adrenal glands. TAK-700 is now in Phase III clinical trials in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and studies are planned for patients who have failed taxotere as well. For information, see the “New Prostate Cancer Info Link,

2) Another new drug is Exelexis’ capozantinib (XL184) which has already received FDA orphan drug approval for the treatment of certain thyroid cancers.  Optimistic reports for XL 184 came from Phase II clinical trials on patients with metastatic  prostate cancer who had failed hormonal therapy. In a group of patients, 95% achieved complete or partial resolution of metastatic bone lesions. Bone scans taken after treatment could not detect any metastases on patients whose previous scans demonstrated substantial cancer spread. The pain accompanying cancer metastasis to the bone was also alleviated.  While XL184 was well tolerated and demonstrated substantial activity against bone metastases, similar dramatic activity against the primary tumor was observed in only six (6) of the 100 patients. Therefore it is too early to predict whether XL184 will extend survival.  XL184, a member of a class of drugs known as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, is designed to work as follows. In cells, MET (otherwise known as hepatocyte growth factor, HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor type-2 (VEGF2) are both proteins produced by cells. MET is involved in tumor cell proliferation, invasion and tumor spread as well as bone metastasis; while VEGF-2 stimulates angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels to feed the tumors. Drugs like XL184 have the potential to “switch off” processes (initiated by tyrosine kinases) within a cell that promote tumor growth.  MET and VEGF also play roles in the function of healthy bone cells such as osteoblasts and osteoclasts. “Switching off” MET and VEGF  simultaneously may block the progression of bone lesions.  While Phase III trials are planned, phase II trials are still recruiting prostate cancer patients in ten states; see http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00940225.  XL184 is also being evaluated against other tumors such as ovarian.  (Reference: Dr. Mark Scholz, in PCRI Insights, May, 2011, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.12-14).

3) A third drug to watch for is Yervoy (previously known as ipilimumab) from Bristol-Myers-Squibb. Yervoy, a human  monoclonal antibody, is a cancer immunotherapy that has previously received FDA approval in March, 2011 to treat melanoma.  The Yervoy antibody targets cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, preventing the antigen from interacting with its ligands and thereby activating the patient’s own immune system by causing these T-cells to potentially combat tumor cells.  More simply, Yervoy blocks a switch that turns off an anti-tumor cellular response. Therefore, Yervoy is an agent that “blocks a blocker” thereby aiding the immune system to fight the tumor.  It should also be mentioned that nearly 13% of patients taking Yervoy had severe autoimmune reactions, consisting of mostly of fatigue and severe skin and gastrointestinal reactions.  The FDA is allowing Yervoy to be evaluated against prostate cancer.

Countering Weight Gain as a Result of Hormonal Therapy.

Benefits and risks accompany virtually every method of treatment. Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer is no exception. Potential risks include osteoporosis and bone fractures, cardiac effects, diabetes, depression, hot flashes and metabolic changes resulting in weight gain. (These issues are discussed on this website under “My Story”, 2009 entries of July 5th-27th, September 29th, October 20th, November 25th, and December 6th, as well as March 12th, 2010.) I have been on continuous or intermittent hormonal therapy since August, 2006. Fortunately, my side effects have been minimal although I had gained approximately fifteen pounds. I was told by a urologist that it was difficult to lose weight while on hormonal therapy. Eventually however, I was determined to lose these unwanted pounds. It has not been easy but I have lost most of the weight while continuing my therapy. I found that once I made up my mind to lose the weight, it was indeed possible with diet and exercise. Here are some practical tips I learned along the way.

Personally, it helped to make an initial investment and enroll in one of the popular advertised weight loss programs. It did not take long to begin to understand their general principles and one could discontinue enrolling after a month or so thus saving money. The diets in general consisted of very low-fat, low-carbohydrate meals with moderate protein content. I found the following strategies to be helpful.

1) Eat a fairly substantial breakfast of whole-grain cereals, fruits and light soy or low-fat milk; eggs (omelets) can be substituted.

2) Eat about 5 small meals a day and eat less as the day progresses. Mid-morning and mid-afternoon 100-calorie snacks (cheese, yogurt, fruit) were useful in curbing hunger.

3) If possible, eat dinner at mid-day and your usual lunch as the evening meal. Low fat meats such as chicken, turkey, lean beef (ground sirloin, lean roast beef) as well as fish become staples. Bread was limited to 1-2 slices of 40-calorie whole grain bread daily. Fresh vegetables and salads with low-fat dressing are of course encouraged. Low-fat mayonnaise is recommended but I personally found that one could never fully replace the flavor of real mayonnaise, so I used it in moderation.

4) Sip on water during the day; drinking an 8 oz. glass before meals helped me eat less while feeling satisfied. Diet drinks can be used but I found that water alone was best in satisfying my hunger.

5) Exercise is a must. Aerobic and weight-bearing exercises are also good for healthy bones. My wife and I exercise for 60 minutes in a gym three-times a week.

6) Minimize the use of alcohol, although a small glass of wine on occasions can be incorporated.

7) To satisfy my salt craving, pretzels seemed to be lowest in calorie content.

8) Don’t eat within three hours of bedtime except for a small piece of fruit or similar low calorie snacks. Midnight snacks are forbidden.

9) The eventual goal is portion control. I found that after a few weeks, my hunger was fully satisfied with 33% less food than I had previously consumed. Maintaining this level remains my goal.

FDA Approves Abiraterone (Zytiga) for Advanced Prostate Cancer

(An initial blog was published on this website on Jan. 8th, 2011, describing results from late stage clinical trials of abiraterone acetate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients.)

On April 28th, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved abiraterone (Zytiga) for the treatment of men with metastatic castration (hormone)-resistant prostate cancer (meaning the disease progresses despite low levels of tumor growth-promoting hormones) that are no longer responding to the chemotherapy drug docetaxel (taxotere). It should also be noted that in spring, 2010, the FDA approved cabazitaxel (Jevtana) for the same indication. (Cabazitaxel is a member of a class of drugs based on natural products called taxanes. These were originally isolated and identified from yew plants.) In both cases, the FDA approvals were based on findings from large phase III trials in which both drugs improved patient survival as reported in the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Bulletin, May 3rd, 2011.

The survival improvements produced by abiraterone and cabazitaxel are meaningful but the benefits are still modest: both drugs improve patients’ median overall survival by approximately 2 to 4 months. One advantage is that abiraterone seemingly has fewer side effects and can be taken orally according to Dr. William Dahut of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Cancer Research.

In the phase III trial, 1,200 patients were randomly assigned to abiraterone administered  in combination with the steroid prednisone or to prednisone plus placebo. The median survival time was 14.8 months in patients who received abiraterone and prednisone compared to 10.9 months in those receiving prednisone alone. In addition to testosterone, abiraterone affects production of other hormones that can lead to side effects such as hypertension. Therefore steroids like prednisone are used to protect against or minimize such side effects. Steroids can have their own long-term side effects, though, so the need to combine abiraterone with steroids could limit use of abiraterone in men with earlier-stage disease and longer life expectancies.

Abiraterone’s target is the production of testosterone. It works by inhibiting an enzyme, CYP17,  that plays a central role in allowing the body to produce testosterone from cholesterol. However, studies have shown that tumor cells adapt to a low-androgen (such as testosterone) environment, in part by increasing the expression of the androgen receptors on their cell surfaces. So, while the overall amount of testosterone in the body may be very low, it is still being produced, and tumor cells develop the ability to take in as much as they can get. For more information, see the following link to WebMD.

With these newly-approved drugs and several others in clinical trials, more research is needed to determine the best sequence of therapies, or which combination of multiple therapeutic agents might be more effective to benefit the individual patient. In addition to abiraterone, two other drugs, TAK-700 and MDV-3100, are in phase III clinical trials in men with castration (hormone)-resistant prostate cancer that is no longer responding to docetaxel. TAK-700 also targets the production of testosterone but it could potentially be used at doses that would not require concomitant steroid supplementation and the resulting side effects of steroids such as prednisone. MDV3100 works differently, disrupting tumor cells’ ability to use testosterone. It does this in part by clogging up androgen receptors on cells which bind testosterone. Because of its mechanism of action, MDV3100 does not have to be used in combination with steroids.

The overall good news is that newer therapies which perform their functions differently are progressing through the pipeline for use in combating prostate cancer.

Promising results for the late-stage prostate cancer drug, MDV3100.

MDV 3100 is a promising new treatment under clinical development by Medivation, Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc. for advanced prostate cancer patients who have already received chemotherapy with taxotere (docetaxel) as well as those who have not been treated with taxotere.  MDV3100 slows growth and induces cell death in bicalutamide (casodex)-resistant cancers via three complementary actions.  MDV3100 blocks testosterone binding to the androgen receptor, impedes movement of the androgen receptor to the nucleus of prostate cancer cells (nuclear translocation) and inhibits binding to DNA. In preclinical experiments published in Science in April 2009(3), the novel, triple-acting, oral androgen receptor antagonist MDV3100 provided more complete suppression of the androgen receptor pathway than bicalutamide (casodex), the most commonly used anti-androgen drug. For further information, see the February 15th, 2011 issue of  ZERO HOUR – an action advisory from ZERO – the project to end prostate cancer.

Positive Phase III clinical trial results for MDV 3100 have been recently disclosed. See the November 18th, 2011 blog from this website.

Are you contemplating open versus minimally-invasive prostate cancer surgery?

The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland is recognized as possessing the foremost urology department in America according to the annual hospital survey in U.S. News and World Reports.  A recent article by Dr. Alan Partin from Johns Hopkins and published on January 26th, 2011 in the Johns Hopkins Health Alerts described the various surgical options for prostate cancer surgery. These include open, laparoscopic and robotic surgery. If you are considering surgery as an option for treating prostate cancer, this article might be useful in your deliberations.