Category: Treatment Information
Combination Therapies in Clinical Trials for Advanced Prostate Cancer
In a recent interview, Dr. Mario Eisenberger, Professor of Urology and oncology at Johns Hopkins, summarized a group of on-going clinical trials for patients with metastatic, hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Trials are ongoing combining agents targeting the androgen receptor such as abiraterone (Zytiga®) with chemotherapies such as docetacel® (taxotere) or cabazitaxel (Jevtana®). Other trials such as the Alliance trial, combines abiraterone with enzalutamide (Xtandi®). An on-going phase III trial combines abiraterone with radium -223 (alpha-radin, Xofigo®) in men with metastaic disease who have not received chemotherapy. Dr. Eisenberger states that there are a number of trials combining approved drugs with chemotherapy and hormonal therapy and radiopharmaceuticals such as radium-223. There are also trials using combinations of PARP inhibitors (s0 far un-approved for prostate cancer) with standard, second line hormonal therapies. Also there are antitumor PI3K and AKT inhibitors some of which inhibit more than one pathway which are over-expressed in prostate cancer patients who progress on androgen receptor-targeted compounds such as abiraterone or enzalutamide. The question is whether PI3K or AKT inhibitors will enhance the effects of abiraterone or enzalutamide. Dr. Eisenberger also discusses trials involving approved agents for metastatic disease as well as unapproved agents like TAK-700 (Ortoronel®) and ARN509 being tested in men with metastatic, hormone-naive cancer. In addition, chemotherapy trials such as CHAARTED and STAMPEDE are discussed. This post is primarily aimed at physicians. If you are a patient with metastatic disease, I suggest you discuss these trials with your physician to see if any one would apply to your specific situation.
Two Radium-223 (alpha-radin) Reviews for Physicians.
Two recent reviews have been published in Oncology describing the history, developmental clinical study results, treatment optimization and future directions for radium-223 chloride in prostate and other cancers. It should be noted that these articles are primarily written for physicians and health care providers. See the accompanying links.
Radium-223 chloride (alpha-radin) is an alpha-particle- emitting radiopharmaceutical which is specifically taken up by bone cells (osteoblasts). These high energy alpha particles with short tissue penetration range allow for targeted prostate cancer cell killing with low toxicity. Improvement in overall survival and relief of skeletal symptoms have been demonstrated in prostate cancer patients who are hormone resistant and have multi-focal symptomatic bone metastases.
Combining Docetaxel (Taxotere) with Hormone Therapy Boosts Survival in Advanced Prostate Cancer
In a follow up to earlier website posts, British researchers have found that starting the chemotherapy drug docetaxel® at the same time as hormone therapy can improve survival for men with newly diagnosed, advanced prostate cancer. The full article describing the study was published in the Prostate Cancer Foundation June 1 issue of NewsPulse. Currently, chemotherapy is generally given after hormone therapy stops working. But the new study found that when the two therapies were paired at the start of treatment, patients lived an average of 10 months longer. The combination had even greater benefits for men whose prostate cancer had spread to other parts of their bodies — known as “metastatic” cancer. These men experienced an average 22-month improvement in their overall survival, the findings showed. Men treated with hormone therapy alone lived an average of 67 months. Those treated with docetaxel® and hormone therapy ended up surviving an average of 77 months, a relative improvement of 24 percent. Those with invasive prostate cancer survived an average 65 months when they received docetaxel® and hormone therapy together, compared with 43 months for men who received just hormone therapy, the investigators found. The chemotherapy drug appeared to benefit men by holding their cancer at bay. Docetaxel® extended the time to relapse by 38 percent in all patients. Hormone therapy can cause fatigue, anemia, brittle bones, decreased muscle mass and loss of sexual function, while chemotherapy drugs open the body to a host of debilitating side effects. But the researchers noted that the addition of chemotherapy to hormone therapy in this study was well-tolerated. Very few men dropped out due to side effects from the chemotherapy, they added. The researchers state that is hoped that these findings will encourage doctors to offer docetaxel® to men newly diagnosed with metastatic cancer.
Similar studies have been discussed in the website posts dated June 9th and May 14th, 2015.
Radiation Plus Hormone Therapy Helps Prostate Cancer That Has Spread to Nearby Lymph Nodes.
A new study suggests that adding radiation therapy to hormone therapy improves the chances of survival for men with prostate cancer that has spread to nearby lymph nodes. Investigators at Massachusetts General Hospital’s Cancer Center focused on 318 patients treated with hormone therapy alone and 318 who received hormone therapy and radiation therapy. The five-year death risk among those who received the combination therapy was 50 percent lower than among those who received hormone therapy alone, the findings showed. The study was published online May 11 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. A summary was published in the Prostate Cancer Foundation June NewsPulse. “It appears that more aggressive local management of prostate cancer confined to the pelvis can offer more durable disease control, prevent the disease from spreading further and, for some patients, even provide a potential cure,” senior study author Dr. Jason Efstathiou, of Massachusetts General Hospital’s Cancer Center and department of radiation oncology, said in a hospital news release.
Investigational mRNA Vaccine Data Shows Promise Against Advanced Prostate Cancer
The self-adjuvanted RNActive vaccine (CV9103) appears to be well-tolerated and immunogenic in men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer, according to a new phase I/IIa study. German researchers have been studying this new vaccine approach and they believe it has the potential to improve outcomes in men with resistant disease.
CV9103 is a sequence-optimized, chemically unmodified mRNA immunotherapy targeting four antigens: prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), and six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1). These antigens are frequently and almost exclusively expressed in the prostate and over-expressed in prostate cancer. However, they noted that PSMA is also over-expressed in other cancers. These antigens were picked for the vaccine because they are mainly found on residual prostate cancer cells after radical prostatectomy or radiation. German researchers conducted a study with CV9103 in 44 patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary endpoint of the study was safety and tolerability, and the secondary endpoints included induction of antigen specific immune responses monitored at baseline and at weeks 5, 9, and 17. Of the 33 evaluable patients treated at 1280 μg, a cellular immune response could be detected in 76% of the patients (n= 25). The researchers, who published their findings in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, found that immune responses against all four antigens could be induced, indicating the versatility of the platform. The study demonstrated that CV9103 was well-tolerated and the majority of treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate.
“The data generated by this phase I/IIa clinical study demonstrate that CV9103 mRNA was well-tolerated and immunogenic. Furthermore, a trend towards longer survival time was also observed in immune responders,” said senior author of the paper Arnulf Stenzl, MD, who is the Medical Director of the Department of Urology, University of Tübingen Medical School, Tübingen, Germany. “Based on these results, it is evident that this mRNA technology warrants further clinical investigation.” The researchers are now conducting a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study in 197 prostate cancer patients with the next generation experimental vaccine CV9104. This second vaccine (CV9104) targets six antigens, including the additional antigens prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and MUC1.
Reducing Bone Metastases in Hormone-Resistant Prostate Cancer
If you have metastatic, hormone-resistant prostate cancer and are concerned about metastases to bone, the following short articles could be of interest to you and especially to your medical practitioner, with whom they should be shared. They are written for physicians and come from a website called Cancer Network – Oncology. Prostate cancer’s unique affinity for metastasis to the bone creates a unique need to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) in order to maximize mobility and quality of life. These articles describe the use of bone supportive agents such as denosumab (Xgeva®) and zoledronic acid (Reclast®) as well as life-extending anticancer therapies such as enzalutamide (Xtandi®), abiraterone (Zytiga®) and radium-223 chloride (alpharadin or Xofigo®). The linked articles are as follows: a) “Reducing Skeletal-Related Events in Metastatic, Castration (Hormone) Resistant Prostate Cancer” ; b) “Hitting Prostate Cancer Where It Hurts: Maximizing Control of Osseous Metastases”; and, c) “Progress in Prostate Cancer – at Last”, an encouraging article that contrasts progress in breast cancer with prostate cancer. Remember to share these with your physician if they apply to your situation.
Side Effects of Surgery and Radiation
The May 2015 issue of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) Prostate Insights contained an excellent summary article describing the potential side effects of both radical prostatectomy and radiation treatment for prostate cancer. The entire article is linked. It is noted that the author went into more detail about the negative side effects of surgery compared to radiation. Therefore, the reader is urged to consult his health provider for further information and clarification regarding side effects of both treatment options and their potential severity.
Seed Implantation Radiation Therapy (Brachytherapy) – an Update.
A blue heron poses in Charlotte Harbor, FL; Photo: BJ Gabrielsen
A updated review of brachytherapy by Dr. John Blasko of the Seattle Prostate Institute recently appeared in the May 2015 issue of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute (PCRI) Insights. Low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer involves the insertion of small radioactive pellets (seed implants) into the prostate by transrectal ultrasound guidance in order to deliver a focused dose of radiation to the prostate. The seeds contain one of three possible radioactive isotopes, namely palladium-103, iodine-125 or cesium-137. While they have slightly different characteristics, they all emit a low energy radiation dose for a period of a few months and then become inert. This radiation dose is delivered to the prostate with very little reaching the sensitive surrounding organs such as the bladder and rectum. The seed implants have proven to be safe and effective for over 25 years. But how does brachytherapy compare with some of the other types of prostate cancer treatment?
Canadian researchers have recently completed analysis of a trial called ASCENDE-RT, a multi-center randomized trial of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) versus brachytherapy for men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. A total of 276 men with high-risk disease and 122 with intermediate-risk disease all received twelve (12) months of androgen deprivation (hormonal) therapy (ADT) plus 46 Gy of whole pelvis external beam radiation (EBRT). Then half of the men (200) were randomly assigned to a conformal external beam boost of 32 Gy while 198 men were randomly assigned a brachytherapy boost of 155 Gy with iodine-125 seeds. Historically, seed implants have been used in one of two ways; as a stand-alone treatment for low-risk cancer or as part of a combination with modest doses of external beam radiation for intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients. In high risk cases, hormonal therapy (ADT) has also often been administered. Many radiation experts have contended that while seed implant boost is effective, the combination of hormones with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is just as effective and simpler to administer. The median observation time after radiation for the 398 men in the trial was 6.5 years enabling statistical projections to be made for 9 years. Using PSA measurements as success indicators, at 5 years, 77% of the men treated with hormone + IMRT alone were relapse-free compared to 89% of the hormone + IMRT + seed boost patients. At 9 years, the relapse free rates were more dramatic at 63% versus 83%, respectively. The researchers conclude that after 9 years of treatment, the PSA-based cure rate of the seed boost patients was improved by 20%! The rationale cited for this improvement is that brachytherapy delivers a higher and more effective dose of radiation to the prostate which is unachievable with external radiation alone. If prostate cancer survival were used as a study endpoint, no difference was seen between the seed boost and the EBRT alone groups. However this may be the case because not enough follow-up time has elapsed for PSA failures to manifest mortalities. An additional 6-7 years of follow up for the PSA failures would be required to translate into survival statistics.
Other innovations have occurred in the application of brachytherapy. Quality of life studies have demonstrated the favorable side effect profile of brachytherapy compared to surgery or IMRT. In addition, transrectal ultrasound imaging has made tremendous strides in clarity of images. There is now also the capability of merging and coordinating MRI imaging with transrectal ultrasound thus increasing the fine control of seed placement. The control of radiation doses to the urethra, bladder and rectum is also greatly improved. Comparative cost and effectiveness analyses by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review at Harvard University concluded that brachytherapy for low-risk disease is the most effective and least expensive initial treatment compared to IMRT, proton beam or surgery. While the use of brachytherapy has decreased from 2002-2010, use of surgical and other treatments have increased primarily due to the introduction of new expensive technologies such as robotics, IMRT and proton beam. While these new approaches may generate more revenue for hospitals and physicians, the popularity of brachytherapy is growing rapidly in many countries where medical reimbursement costs are fixed. The author of this review concludes that “multiple studies over the past 25 years have demonstrated that brachytherapy either alone or in combination with external beam radiation is as effective and, – particularly in intermediate and high-risk disease -, superior to prostatectomy or IMRT alone for cure and potential quality-of-life. The ASCENDE-RT prospective, randomized trial proves the superior cure rates attainable with seed implantation.” It is also cost-effective.
The content of this post is for informational purposes only. Please discuss it with your personal health-care provider as needed.